xorg package names aren't starting at 7.0
David Timms
dtimms at bigpond.net.au
Thu Jan 5 16:56:14 UTC 2006
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>Have you looked at the source tarballs for the individual components now?
>
No.
>for example xf86-input-mouse-X11R7.0-1.0.3.1.tar.bz2
>the individual components are getting release numbers which a seperate
>from the global release. In the case of the mouse package that
>release is 1.0.3.x
>
I can see from your eg why it makes sense for rh/fedora to use the
package versioning that the upstream developers use, otherwise it would
be even more confusing.
>...If FC ships some
>components that match the versions in X11R7 and some versions which
>are updates beyond whats in X11R7. Why is it appropriate to brand all
>these things as X11R7?
>
I guess that the upstream developers could start at 6.99 ? for the
a/b/test/rc's and move to 7.0.0 at the time that the major release is
made, and then they could all free float from there on ?
Thanks for the reasoning.
DaveT.
More information about the test
mailing list