rawhide report: 20060114 changes

[Paul F. Johnson]

Hi,

> > If I exclude mono-core, I don't get any dependency failures which means
> > (to me) nothing in todays rawhide needed it - so why did yum try to
> > download it?
> 
> BE SPECIFIC
> wtf SPECFIC dep failures did you encounter?

How specific do I need to be. I exclude mono from the yum update and had
NO, Zilch, NILL, NULL, Nicht, Sweet FA dep failures.

> yum goes through all the trouble of giving you the SPECFIC information
> about dependancy failures... if you want the rest of us to understand
> wtf you are seeing.. we really need to see the SPECIFIC failures as
> generated by yum.

Try reading the email then. I exclude mono, I get no dep failures which
means that nothing either on my system or in the updates relies on it.

TTFN

Paul
-- 
main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86,
0,a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1,_,a ):3,main (-94,-27+t,a)&&t==2?_<13?main(2,
_+1,"%s %d %d\n"):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de}
+,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r :'d*'3,}{w+K 
w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l q#'+d'K#!/+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl]
'/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){nl]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#n
'wk nw' iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c ;;{nl'-{}
rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# }'+}##
(!!/"):t<-50?_==*a?putchar(31[a]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a=='/')+t,_,a+1
):0<t?main(2,2,"%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a,"!ek;dc i at bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l
,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);}