kernel-2.6.15-1.1861_FC5.src.rpm
D Canfield
canfield at uindy.edu
Fri Jan 20 19:27:10 UTC 2006
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 04:44:45PM -0700, Don Springall wrote:
> > Since this source file is 2.6.16-rc1-git1 plus redhat patches should it not
> > be named Kernel-2.6.16-1.1861_FC5.src.rpm and be built into
> > /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.16 by rpmbuild ?
>
> No. The final 'x' part of 2.6.x in the version string only gets
> bumped when the tarball the rpm is based on is 2.6.16
>
> Dave
>
>
And just to spell things out a bit more, this seems consistent with FC
Test numbering... 4.90 is a (post-4) development release of FC 5 just as
2.6.15-xxxxx is a post-2.6.15 development release of 2.6.16. The
changelog has been great about noting which version of the kernel a
release is actually based on, so for those that really care, the info is
readily available via rpm -q --changelog.
DC
More information about the test
mailing list