FC5T2 ready for even a test release?

[Rahul Sundaram]

Ian Burrell wrote:

>On 1/22/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at redhat.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>... because its not so good.
>>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2006-January/msg01138.html.
>>Tell me on what occasions would a end user need it?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>I wonder if there is a way to have an Everything option that isn't
>special checkbox in the installer but fits in with the groups. 
>Everything would basically require all other groups, and specify that
>all optional packages in those groups were installed.  It wouldn't
>even have to select every group. Leaving out the language specific
>groups would make sense since people will complain about getting
>languages they don't speak even if they selected everything.
>
>I don't think comps.xml has a mechanism to specify which packages in a
>groupreq should be selected.  I was thinking an attribute on the
>groupreq element which would have the values "mandatory", "default",
>"optional".
>
> - Ian
>  
>
See the earlier bug reports on comps.xml related work. You can post your 
comments there or on followup discussion in anaconda lists. Thanks


-- 
Rahul 

Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers