ATrpms goes FC6

[Axel Thimm]

On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 09:24:59AM -0700, alan wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >usually ATrpms jumps into testing at test2 or test3. This time we'll
> >try supporting FC6 from test1 onwards.
> >
> >A couple of notes:
> >
> >o ATrpms uses disttags of 5.90 matching the internal verisoning of
> > test1. When test2 hits the road packages will all be rebuilt with
> > 5.91 as a disttag and so on. That way upgrade paths are retained
> > (but these are not guaranteed within test releases/rawhide anyway,
> > so don't feel on the safe side) and rebuilds don't have to bump the
> > buildtag in front of the disttag, so when your FC5 box has
> > foo-1.2.3-4.* and test/rawhide bits also start with foo-1.2.3-4.* it
> > means that the same sources/specfiles are still used.
> >
> >o kernel support (kmdls) is there, both for the test release kernel,
> > 2.6.16-1.2289_FC6, as well as hopefully the latest rawhide kernel,
> > 2.6.17-1.2318_FC6. Oops, the latest is already 2.6.17-1.2328.fc6,
> > and by the time you're reading this probably even further. The point
> > is that ATrpms will try to support the latest rawhide kernel, but it
> > certainly can't keep up to the pace of rawhide. :)
> >
> >o Please report bugs, especially regression wrt FC5 on
> > bugzilla.atrpms.net under fc6.
> 
> Cool.  The only problem I see is that the nVIDIA kernel driver is bjorken 
> with xorg 7.1.  (And will be until they create a Linux driver for the 9xxx 
> series of drivers.)
> 
> Are there x86_64 builds?

Yes, but only for the FC6t1 kernel (2.6.16-1.2289_FC6). I saw that the
build breaks for rawhide kernels, so I didn't make the nvidia builds
public, yet.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20060701/6af6a467/attachment.bin