conflicting i86 and x86_64 in repo?
jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Jul 14 13:03:41 UTC 2006
On Friday 14 July 2006 08:57, tomhorsley at adelphia.net wrote:
> Has pup screwed up at some point and installed i386 rpms when it should
> have picked x86_64 ones? Have the repos gotten corrupted at some point?
> Or is it really legitimate to have two conflicting rpms like this?
Yum, which pup users, will install both the i386 and the x86_64 version of a
package if you request to install "package". This ensures that you have a
proper environment for running 32 bit software if need be.
If there is a conflict between the i386 and the x86_64 version of a package
provided in the x86_64 repository, then there is a bug in said package. If
the package is supplied multiarch it must not have any conflicts.
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20060714/e8c19ccd/attachment.bin
More information about the test