iptables Problem
Michal Jaegermann
michal at harddata.com
Thu Sep 14 19:48:50 UTC 2006
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:58:02AM -0400, Janina Sajka wrote:
> >
> No, we flushed the ruleset in order to make certain we're isolating the
> problem. Furthermore, iptables output suggests it's working, but it
> doesn't actually work udp, though tcp works just as it should.
If this is indeed a complete set of rules then maybe you found
a bug. I do not know.
>
> iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -p udp -d 66.92.XXX.XXX/32 --dport 5060 -j DNAT --to-destination 172.23.203.213
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 66.92.XXX.XXX/32 --dport 5060 -j DNAT --to 172.23.203.213
If you will fold two rules above into one by dropping protocol
specifications does this change anything? According to docs
DNAT option should be "--to-destination" in the second case too.
> iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -s 172.23.203.213/32 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j SNAT --to-source 66.92.XXX.XXX
Two comments though. Personally when checking bigger rule sets I
find an output of 'iptables-save', which writes on stdout, easier to
read than 'iptables -L'. Also there is a LOG target which can help
to track packets as they traverse through your iptables.
Michal
More information about the test
mailing list