all I wanted was to update the kernel, not a crypto lesson ...
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Oct 3 14:17:29 UTC 2007
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:07:27 +0100
"Christopher Brown" <snecklifter at gmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone then explain to me why the rawhide key does not already
> exist on an installed system? Should this not be set up as with base,
> updates and others to prevent issues like Nelson's?
The two keys used right now are
pub 1024D/4F2A6FD2 2003-10-27
uid Fedora Project <fedora at redhat.com>
Used for final releases and updates.
pub 1024D/30C9ECF8 2003-10-27
uid Fedora Project (Test Software) <rawhide at redhat.com>
Used for Test releases and updates-testing.
Both of which are installed on the system, however not imported into
the rpmdb.
These keys may change in the future as we transition to a signing
server to sign packages (and to close up some confusion between Test
and rawhide stuff).
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20071003/dbb0c933/attachment.bin
More information about the test
mailing list