High definition video not working on F9? compat-libstdc...

Martin Sourada martin.sourada at gmail.com
Fri Apr 25 09:29:55 UTC 2008


On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 09:40 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> Martin Sourada wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 11:44 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> >> I have some high-def video trailers I downloaded via azureus and I
> >> can't play them on F9 Preview (with all codecs installed).
> ...
> >> $ totem IronManTrailer2-1080p.mkv
> >> ** Message: Error: File
> >> "/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libmch264dec.so.7.4.0.20778" could not be
> >> used.
> >> fluh264dec.c(414): gst_fluh264dec_setup (): /play/decodebin0/fluh264dec0:
> >> Could not open module: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file:
> >> No such file or directory
> >>
> >>
> >> (totem:9953): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_object_unref: assertion
> >> `object != NULL' failed
> >>
> >> (totem:9953): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_object_unref: assertion
> >> `object != NULL' failed
> >>
> >> (totem:9953): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_object_unref: assertion
> >> `object != NULL' failed
> >>
> > This one is obvious, just install compat-libstdc++-33-0:3.2.3-63.i386.
> 
> If that solves it, nice pickup, but that is only the first part of the 
> equation: the rpm packaging of something is missing this requires. But 
> which package ?
> 
From the error message it's obvious that the library with problems
is /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libmch264dec.so.7.4.0.20778 which is from
fluendo. I've never used these, so I don't know how are they installed
(rpm? untar? make?) and what can be done in that matter to fix the
issue. I would wonder if that were via rpm, since rpm should pick up the
libstdc++.so.5 dependency during the build automatically.

> Or is it that the fluendo codecs need to be rebuilt against the libs 
> that are in fedora 9 ?
> 
> And how to make sure it gets into F9 GA, so that we don't need to keep 
> explaining howto and instead it just works for users ?
> 
Would be nice if PackageKit, or some other dbus service, could pick up
those error messages and offer the user installation of the missing
libraries if they are in repos... But that seems rather like a feature
for F10...

> DaveT.
> 
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20080425/01688cc7/attachment.bin 


More information about the test mailing list