superuser console?

[Alain PORTAL]

Le vendredi 02 mai 2008, John Summerfield a écrit :
> Alain PORTAL wrote:
> > Le jeudi 01 mai 2008, Rex Dieter a �crit :
> >> Alain PORTAL wrote:
> >>> Is it a KDE or a Fedora non-feature?
> >>
> >> KDE (ie, we haven't done anything to affect this anyway).
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > And nobody complaint about that????
> >
> > Every body is happy with that behaviour?
>
> I've been using KDE since 1.x or so. On f9 I use Gnome.
>
> > Nobody needs dayly a console with fully superuser permissions when he
> > works as a normal user?
>
> I set up and use sudo, so the lack of root console wouldn't affect me,
> even if I continued using KDE.
>
> > As an example, every time I need to know a status service, I need
> > to "/sbin/service" instead of "service"?
>
> Configure $PATH in .bashrc or .bash_profile
>
> > For me, this really a regression about a Linux Distribution can offer me.
> >
> > Should I have to build my Linux from scratch to get an old behaviour?
>
> Be our guest:-)
>
> Might be easier to switch to Debian, Ubuntu or OpenSUSE. If you want to
> build your own, try gentoo.

Bravo! Everybody applauds. And I'm sure you think you're smart

-- 
Les pages de manuel Linux en français
http://manpagesfr.free.fr/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20080502/c6e2f34e/attachment.bin