Fedora 9 updates-testing report

[Greg]

Adrin Jalali wrote:
> I think this release is one of the most unstable releases ever in 
> redhat/fedora history.
>
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:30 AM, seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org 
> <mailto:skvidal at fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
>
>     On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 22:29 +0000, updates at fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:updates at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>     >     yum-3.2.16-1.fc9
>
>     So, let's just suffice to say: Don't use this release. I'll build a -2
>     in a bit.
>
>     -sv
>
>
>     --
>     fedora-test-list mailing list
>     fedora-test-list at redhat.com <mailto:fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
>     To unsubscribe:
>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
>
why is it unstable? it was shipped with Pre-Release of Xorg7.4 an 1.5 so 
its not like the Fedora users werent warned. plus when you use fedora 
your using Bleeding Edge software, you have to expect some things to be 
unstable at first, its like a Brand New car, when you buy one, even that 
has its problems until you get it fixed

-- 
Regards Greg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: spowd.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 147 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20080518/be059b20/attachment.vcf