Problem setting up wired networking
Anne Wilson
cannewilson at googlemail.com
Fri Nov 14 17:28:17 UTC 2008
On Friday 14 November 2008 17:00:49 Chuck Anderson
wrote:
> Try repeating "iwlist scanning" a few times in a row--
sometimes it
> takes a few tries for results to appear.
>
No joy.
> But, this seems like a kernel driver issue then, nothing
to do with
> wpa_supplicant or NetworkManager. To be sure, could
you temporarily
> turn those off, reboot, and repeat those steps above?
>
> chkconfig --level 2345 NetworkManager off
>
> (wpa_supplicant should always be off by default
anyway, but in case:
> chkconfig --level 2345 wpa_supplicant off
> don't turn it back on again after testing since it is
launched
> automatically as needed by NM)
>
> After testing, you can turn NetworkManager back on:
>
> chkconfig --level 2345 NetworkManager on
>
> This will help by eliminating NetworkManager or
wpa_supplicant as the
> cause of "no scan results".
>
> Remeber to try "iwlist scanning" a few times in a row.
>
Again, none of this made any difference.
> > Wow - some progress, if only small. In view of what
> > appears above I renamed ifcfg-wlan0 and created a
new
> > one. I immediately got a popup saying that I am
now
> > connected to myESSID. BUT, the icon shows a very
weak
> > signal, and ifconfig shows that it has the address
> > 10.42.44.1, while my network is a 192.168.0.x LAN.
>
> Strange.
>
> > This is the situation I reached a couple of days ago,
and
> > I'm comopletely foxed by it.
> >
> > Running iwconfig wlan0 again I now get
> >
> > wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"myESSID"
> > Mode:Ad-Hoc Frequency:2.412 GHz Cell:
> > 36:8F:3A:45:3F:BC
> > Tx-Power=27 dBm
> > Retry min limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment
thr=2352
> > B
> > Power Management:off
> > Link Quality:0 Signal level:0 Noise level:0
> > Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx
invalid
> > frag:0
> > Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed
> > beacon:0
> >
> > I tried changing the setup from ad-hoc to
Infrastructure,
> > but that breaks things - I can no longer connect.
>
> ad-hoc should only be for computer-to-computer
connections, not
> computer-to-accesspoint.
>
That's why I tried to change it - without success.
> > FWIW, my router does not list this netbook as a
> > connected device.
>
> I'm guessing that you really didn't connect anywhere--
you just created
> a new ad-hoc connection so that other computers
could have connected
> to you on an ad-hoc basis.
>
> Beyond the debugging of "scanning" above, you could
ignore scanning
> and try to manually connect to a specific network.
With
> NetworkManager disabled:
>
> iwconfig wlan0 essid myESSID
> iwconfig wlan0 mode Managed
> ifconfig wlan0 up
>
> Now check a few times to see if it eventually associates
to the AP:
>
> iwconfig wlan0
>
> Eventually, you should see it say "associated".
I can't get an association. At the end of all this I get
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"myESSID"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.412 GHz Access
Point: Not-Associated
Tx-Power=27 dBm
Retry min limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr=2352
B
Encryption key:off
Power Management:off
Link Quality:0 Signal level:0 Noise level:0
Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid
frag:0
Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed
beacon:0
> If that happens, you
> could try to get an IP address configured by manually
starting the
> dhcp client:
>
> dhclient wlan0
>
Although I hadn't got an association, I tried it anyway. It
said dhclient was already running, and exited.
>
> If you can repeatably connect fine using this method,
then there is
> probably a problem with the kernel driver scanning for
networks.
> NetworkManager won't work well if scanning doesn't
work.
>
>
> Some SELinux notes:
>
> The above tests might work best with SELinux in
permissive mode.
>
I have already changed to permissive mode.
> If you run in permissive mode for a while, your system
may no longer
> have correct file labels. After testing in permissive
mode, when you
> are ready to switch back to enforcing mode, it is a
good idea to:
>
> touch /.autorelabel
> reboot
>
> To fix the labels on the entire system.
OK - I'll try to remember that :-)
Anne
More information about the test
mailing list