Introduction: new community guy, and some discussion
Anne Wilson
cannewilson at googlemail.com
Thu Feb 5 21:06:46 UTC 2009
On Thursday 05 February 2009 19:46:47 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 February 2009 03:01:27 Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> Hi! I am Adam Williamson. I am working for Red Hat as of this Monday.
> >
> > Hi Adam. Good to talk to you again. One thing I'd like you to think
> > about, though I have no idea what can be done about it. It's well-known
> > that distros tweak KDE to make things work more to their liking. It's
> > equally well-known that the practice can cause some friction :-) and
> > users asking KDE people about problems are quite likely to be told that
> > there is no help because it is down to some action of Fedora.
>
> Fedora rarely patches KDE other than a few minor backports and some
> tweaking of defaults but this sort of criticism goes both ways. While
> other distributions patched KDE 4 heavily to make it parallel
> installable with KDE 3, Fedora did not and received quite a bit of flake
> for that. What would be the upstream standpoint on this?
>
There are no winners, Rahul. Personally I've been using both Fedora and
Mandriva, and I can see advantages in both approaches.
I'm not asking for anything to change, just some guidance that make sure that
we understand what is and what is not a Fedora issue. At the moment I tend to
base my judgement on whether I can see the problem in both my distros, and
preferably get a *buntu user to say that they also see the problem. If I
can't get some confirmation I'm inclined to think that it's probably Fedora.
Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20090205/db4176cb/attachment.bin
More information about the test
mailing list