Release-critical bug process?

[Jesse Keating]

On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:43 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>  
> b) We all more or less agreed that the process should make it quite easy
> to nominate a bug to 'block' a release, and bugzappers will probably do
> a lot of that, but ultimately for now it's probably right for Jesse (or,
> more formally, RelEng) to be the ultimate arbiter. Jesse would like us
> to err on the side of nominating things to be blockers - he's more
> worried about missing something important than the time it takes to weed
> out things he doesn't consider critical.

Further additions.  I'll always prefer the domain expert for a bug make
the call for "blocker or not".  You'll see me and others use the bug to
get the maintainer to make such a call, or provide us with enough
information that we can make the call having been better informed.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20090211/83c2f14e/attachment.bin