Rawhide Acceptance Test Plan

James Laska jlaska at redhat.com
Fri Jun 19 16:34:29 UTC 2009


On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 12:27 -0400, Will Woods wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 09:16 -0700, Tom London wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Will Woods<wwoods at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 16:23 -0400, Will Woods wrote:
> > >> Hi folks,
> > >>
> > >> Here's the first draft of a plan describing Rawhide Acceptance Testing.
> > >
> > > Er. *here* it is:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Rawhide_Acceptance_Test_Plan
> > >
> > > -w
> > >
> > Should test cases for both encrypted and unencrypted roots be included?
> 
> Yes, but not here. This plan outlines a *very* basic check to see
> whether Rawhide is even worth testing further.

Tests for [un]encrypted root can be found in the installer test plan
Liam posted earlier.

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-June/msg00529.html

Thanks,
James

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20090619/1dc32df4/attachment.bin 


More information about the test mailing list