Interesting comments

TK009 john.brown009 at
Thu Mar 12 02:26:34 UTC 2009

Adam Williamson wrote:
> I should add that I'm talking in terms of practicality here, and taking
> into consideration that we have not many active triagers trying to
> triage a very large amount of bugs. In that situation, it's sometimes
> better to triage 100 bugs without reproduction at an accuracy rate of
> 85% than it is to triage 15 bugs with reproduction at an accuracy rate
> of 95%. IMHO, anyway.
That is it in a nutshell. Less than 20 active triagers (according to the 
list, 6000+ 
bugs in NEW state. I never discourage others from reproducing, if they 
can, it's a bonus. Requiring that a triager try and reproduce every bug, 
is asking to much of mostly (all?) volunteers.


More information about the test mailing list