Standardize/ have consistency in the layout of How_to_Debug_<component> wiki pages.

[James Laska]

On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 12:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 15:19 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > Going back to what pages do we focus on.  Seems like the informal
> > approach that's happening now is ideal.  Build pages for high-impact
> > features that will introduce a high bug rate (e.g. xorg-x11-drv-* and
> > dracut).  This can be part of the service offered by the QA group as
> > features come online.  We can provide focused test days and some
> > documentation to aid others to self-diagnose and/or provide quality
> > bug
> > reports. 
> 
> Sure, but I think Johann's idea to standardize the layout and audience
> target of the pages we _do_ have is a good one.

Definitely, I think that's a huge win.  My comments were more focused on
what pages to target next.

Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20091008/dd7e9c7c/attachment.bin