rawhide report: 20091027 changes

Bill Nottingham notting at redhat.com
Tue Oct 27 15:18:46 UTC 2009


Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski (D.Mierzejewski at icm.edu.pl) said: 
> > Here's the tickets that discussed the removal:
> > 
> > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2712
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523998
> > 
> > lam should probably be added back until the dependent programs can be
> > migrated to use OpenMPI.
> 
> I notice that there isn't a word there about who will be responsible for
> fixing the packages which depend on LAM currently. You can't just remove
> a package without some sort of early warning and a plan to fix the
> fall-out.

It has now been unblocked. Given the maintiner's original wish to have
it removed, I suspect it needs a new maintainer.

Bill




More information about the test mailing list