New release criterion proposal

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 04:54 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> ----- "Adam Williamson" <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi, all. At the last blocker meeting, we realized there are no
> > release
> > criteria regarding remote-accessible installs. If you can't install
> > Fedora to be remote-accessible out of the box, some sysadmins will
> > have
> > a lot of trouble. So I propose we add this to the criteria:
> > 
> > "With the correct install configuration, it should be possible to
> > make
> > an installed system immediately remotely accessible (you should be
> > able
> > to install with a secure remote access service active and unblocked
> > by
> > firewall-type mechanisms)"
> 
> Will that also cover
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572489 ? I would be glad
> if we could use that criterion to mark such bugs as blockers.

It depends on whether 'network doesn't come up on boot' applies to a
typical remote-accessible install, I guess. I wouldn't want to say, I'd
rather ask someone with real-world experience of doing such installs.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net