Final Draft for Join Proven Testers Policy

[Jesse Keating]

On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:14 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> I'm going to try and pull this off and talk to multiple people at once.
> 
> AdamW: Agreed, nuked the last section.
> 
> JLaska: I like the edits, many thanks
> 
> Shmuel and Kevin: I removed the reference to  Fedora 13, that was
> actually just pulled in because of a nice little wiki trick I found
> that would have auto updated itself to the next branched release but I
> went ahead and removed it in order to remove the potential for
> confusion.
> 
> Thanks again everyone for your time and comments!
> 
> Random side note on the mention of the QA FAS group, I will update
> that to proventesters once I get the group request complete.
> 
> Updated wiki page at the same happy location:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/JoinProvenTesters:Draft


So you say that once the above steps are complete (eg sign, pick a
mentor, and apply for the group), your application for approval will be
reviewed, and once approved you will be able to "apply for, and be
approved for,".  Yet according to the steps, one should already have
applied for the proven testers group.

The first sentence of Proven Testers Mentor Candidates is quite
difficult to follow.  I think there is a missing punctuation making this
two sentences.

Also, I'd make the sentence read "If a candidate has a preference as to
whom mentors them, they must request ...."  The way it reads now it
almost seems like you always have to request a specific one, as the "if
you have a preference" is a secondary thought.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20100422/96d8f990/attachment.bin