[Fedora QA] #116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable

[Fedora QA]

#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts
to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  adamwill  |       Owner:  rhe     
      Type:  defect    |      Status:  assigned
  Priority:  major     |   Milestone:          
 Component:  Wiki      |     Version:          
Resolution:            |    Keywords:          
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by rhe):

  * status:  new => assigned

Comment:

 Replying to [ticket:116 adamwill]:
 > = bug description =
 >
 > Please update the
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts test
 case to clarify that explicit Conflicts: tags are okay.
 >
 > = bug analysis =
 >
 > The relevant release criterion is "No file conflicts or unresolved
 package dependencies during a media-based (CD/DVD) install". The term
 "file conflicts" here is important. I believe it's intended to mean that
 only cases where the files in two packages conflict, but there is no
 explicit Conflicts: tag in the packages. Where the conflict is properly
 marked in the packages with Conflicts: tags, this should not be considered
 an infringement of the criterion.
 >
 > = fix recommendation =
 >
 > Change expected results:
 >
 > 2. No file conflicts were detected for packages included in the media
 kit, unless the conflicting packages also have explicit Conflicts: tags

 That makes sense, I've updated the case. Thanks, Adam.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/116#comment:1>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance