[Fedora QA] #116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable

[Fedora QA]

#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts
to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  adamwill  |       Owner:  rhe     
      Type:  defect    |      Status:  reopened
  Priority:  major     |   Milestone:          
 Component:  Wiki      |     Version:          
Resolution:            |    Keywords:          
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment (by adamwill):

 They're both 'present' in the sense of 'present in the repos' as a
 temporary fallback measure, yes. They're both 'present' in the sense of
 'present on the media' because of how pungi works (AIUI) - we don't
 actually really want/need both on the media, but they get pulled in
 because they both satisfy a dependency of upstart, and pungi pulls all
 packages that can possibly satisfy a given dependency.

 I'm fine with continuing to test for all conflicts if you think that's
 easier, and we can evaluate whether they're actually release blockers on a
 case-by-case basis. But we should adjust the criterion.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/116#comment:15>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance