2010-12-13 - Fedora QA meeting recap

[James Laska]

As always, minutes and IRC log available at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20101213

= Attendees =

People present (lines said)
      * jlaska (152)
      * adamw (41)
      * jskladan (37)
      * kparal (32)
      * wwoods (26)
      * fcami__ (25)
      * brunowolff (5)
      * mkrizek (2)
      * fenrus02 (1)
      * phuzion (1)
      * jsmith (1)
      * Alam (1)
      * Viking-Ice (1)

Unable to attend:
      * rhe (hopefully sleeping)

= Agenda =
      * Proposed meeting agenda -
        http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-December/095996.html 
      * MeetBot summary -
        http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-12-13/fedora-qa.2010-12-13-16.00.html 

== Previous meeting follow-up ==

== Call for Test Days ==

Owner : adamwill
Summary
      * Call for ideas/owners for Fedora 15 Test Days -
        http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_15_test_days
      * Monitor feature list for ideas
        (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/15/FeatureList)
      * Several events scheduled so far (GNOME 3, Xfce 4.8 and X Test
        Week)
Next steps ...
     1. Contribute ideas to
        http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:QA/Fedora_15_test_days
     2. Identify owners to organize and host test days
     3. Schedule another l10n/i18n test day

== Bodhi patch ==

Owner : fcami
Summary
      * Posted a bodhi patch
        (http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-December/095866.html) to improve the bugzilla comment bodhi posts when an update is available 
      * See also
        http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/701
Next steps ...
     1. fcami to update patch to thread on bodhi at lists.fedorahosted.org
     2. Await review and merge from lmacken

== Python script communicating with bugzilla ==

Owner : Bruno
Summary
      * See http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/89
      * Tune existing python scripts to detect UNTESTED blocker bugs
      * Bruno drafted a set of sample queries, see
        https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bruno#Mockup_for_QA_-_Tracking_bug_queries
      * The team discussed different approaches for how to integrate
        this list into current process
Next steps ...
     1. The team tentatively agreed to review the list in each blocker
        review meeting
     2. jlaska going to merge the proposed queries into the Blocker
        meeting SOP

== Requirements review for Fedora test case management ==

Owner : rhe
Summary
      * See http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/152
      * Requirements review for Fedora test case management
      * Hurry started drafting requirements at
        https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_requirements_proposal
Next steps ...
     1. Hurry will continue refining requirements
     2. All - please review and add any comments/concerns in Talk page

== Critical Path test case development ==

Owner : adamwill
Summary
      * See http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/154
      * Still experimenting with some mock-ups/examples
Next steps ...
     1. AdamW planning to mail the list explaining proposed system and
        linking to examples

== AutoQA Update ==

Owner : kparal
Summary
      * clumens' anaconda_storage test has been reviewed and ready to
        land in git ''master'' branch
      * The patch representing second attempt for solving
        http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/autoqa/205 has landed into
        autoqa-devel.  That means we will be able to send our test
        results as comments into Bodhi.
      * lmacken enabled us to use staging Bodhi instance for AutoQA
        development purposes (mainly he turned off email notifications).
        Kudos to him for that
      * mkrizek and I worked on
        http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/autoqa/241 [6] ("Add support
        for a staging server"). The patch is not posted yet (waiting for
        previous patch to land in master), but the code is available at
        mkrizek-staging branch
      * jskladan works on a different kind of a koji watcher. His work
        is available in the 'new_koji_watcher' branch. His work should
        enable us to hook up depcheck properly into our framework.  Some
        discussion followed on how best to group -pending updates, the
        group agreed to discuss offline
      * wwoods still working on a blog post and code to handle
        http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/autoqa/248 (simultaneous
        depcheck test runs)
Next steps ...
     1. Wwoods posting blog article explaining the need for
        http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/autoqa/248
     2. Determine appropriate strategy for watcher and depcheck
        integration, and revise patchset as needed

= Open discussion - <Your topic here> =

= Action items =
     1. jlaska to ping jens+rhe and Alam for thoughts on a F15 l10n/i18n
        test day
     2. jlaska to merge
        [[User:Bruno#Mockup_for_QA_-_Tracking_bug_queries]] into
        [[QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting]]

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20101214/a31bddfe/attachment.bin