Spins late TM approval

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

On 02/20/2010 06:24 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 08:19:57AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 15:01 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>>> I would rather have the SIG be in a position to make the assumption
>>> that
>>> the Desktop and KDE spins are safe and well-cared of rather then the
>>> Fedora Project itself doing so, and I would want to eliminate the
>>> "exception to the normal process" for these spins so that we have one
>>> less exception to the rules. 
>>
>> I still don't see the Desktop an KDE live images as "spins".  The KDE
>> one is borderline.
> 
> While I do see the KDE Live image as a spin, the fact remains that I
> can name a sizable handful of people who are constantly involved in
> ensuring its proper working order.  Messrs. Kofler, Dieter, Ngo,
> Parrish, Řezník, and Boeckel come to mind off hand.  I'm sure there
> are quite a few others.
> 

I fail to see how the number of people involved (that we know of, that
we can point out) is part of the definition of a "spin".

-- Jeroen