bodhi editing - QA hazard

Michael Cronenworth mike at cchtml.com
Fri Jul 23 15:53:01 UTC 2010


Matt McCutchen wrote:
> I went down this path a while ago and was told to chill and let
> maintainers use Bodhi however they wish:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-April/134671.html

Hah. When one of these edited updates kills a system, will Adam and Jeff 
backtrack on their comments then?

> Yes, that seems like an obvious change.  Some related tickets:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/388
> https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/413

Great. Thanks.

I know I can't stomp my feet and say fix it now, but learning bodhi's 
code and providing patches is above my amount of time I can provide to 
Fedora at the moment.


More information about the test mailing list