bodhi editing - QA hazard

Adam Williamson awilliam at
Fri Jul 23 15:58:05 UTC 2010

On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 08:35 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 09:17 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > It seems bodhi is abused more than I thought. [...]
> > Why does bodhi allow editing of the package version? It seems that field 
> > should be locked from editing and the only course of action would be to 
> > delete the update and create a new one.
> I went down this path a while ago and was told to chill and let
> maintainers use Bodhi however they wish:
> > Another alternative would be to 
> > have bodhi modified to reset karma points if the package field changes.
> Yes, that seems like an obvious change.  Some related tickets:

I believe this is the intended future fix. As Matt says, we've been on
this trip before. =)
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org

More information about the test mailing list