Possible new release criterion: installation boot menu

He Rui rhe at redhat.com
Mon Jul 26 05:20:09 UTC 2010


On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 12:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 14:47 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> 
> > > I was just trying to cover the possibilities. For me, the appearance of
> > > a graphical menu is really a polish issue and doesn't fit well with
> > > Alpha, it seems more suited to Beta or Final. But the practical element
> > > is whether the boot-to-the-installer process actually works, no matter
> > > what you see in the meantime. For me the loss of the other options on
> > > the menu isn't really critical until beta, but the install process
> > > should at least start if you just boot and wait at Alpha stage.
> > > 
> > > It may be too much effort to draw this distinction, though, in which
> > > case we may as well go with #1.
> > 
> > Yeah, definitely #1.
> 
> I have gone ahead and added this criterion to the F14 Alpha criteria:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_Release_Criteria#Alpha_Release_Requirements

Thanks for clarifying, I've added this as one expected result in boot
method tests[1].

Cheers,
Hurry

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Installer_Boot_Methods  

-- 
Contacts

Hurry
FAS Name: Rhe 
Timezone: UTC+8
TEL: 86-010-62608141
IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh



More information about the test mailing list