Fedora 14 Schedule
jlaska at redhat.com
Mon Jun 21 17:44:47 UTC 2010
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 10:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 08:35 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 06/18/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >> 3. Calling it a Test _Day_ sure makes it sound like it is limited to a
> > >> single 24hour period. Maybe this is a marketing problem, is there a
> > >> better name?
> > >
> > > If there is, I haven't been able to think of it :(. As I said, the
> > > problem is it cuts both ways; the 'day' concept has good connotations as
> > > well as bad ones. I haven't been able to come with anything that keeps
> > > the good while cutting the bad. Suggestions gratefully received!
> > What about "Test Blitz"? We document that developers will be online for
> > one particular day, but that testers can submit results for the duration
> > of the blitz, which can be longer than one day.
> It's a good shot. It feels a little fuzzy, though; the name alone
> doesn't convey much about the concept. I'm not sure. What do others
More food for thought ...
I've heard thoughts from others about how the 'test day' name doesn't
accurately match the effort. One suggestion was to rebrand the effort
as 'bug day'. Similar to http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/BugDays
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20100621/662fa96d/attachment.bin
More information about the test