Package in fedora repo has no public key ?

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Mon Mar 8 21:53:00 UTC 2010


On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 14:56 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 19:36 +0000, Tommy He wrote:
> > Hello testers,
> > 
> > Yesterday when I performed the update, package sos from fedora repo
> > was reported due to the missing public key.
> > 
> > warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID
> > 57bbccba: NOKEY
> > fedora/gpgkey                                            | 3.2 kB
> > 00:00 ... 
> > 
> > 
> > Public key for sos-1.9-1.fc12.noarch.rpm is not installed
> > 
> > Is it normal for a package in fedora repo during the alpha phase ? 
> > 
> > Kind regards,
> > Tommy He
> 
> There were several old (Fedora 12) packages that weren't yet signed with
> the Fedora 13 key.  The majority of those seem to have been handled so
> far, but looks like a few remain.
> 
> Maybe someone from Fedora release engineering has insight?

Same thing's being discussed on -devel right now.

It's an F12 update that's been inherited into F13, hence the problem.
Jesse says he thought about it when he set up the inheritance, but
forgot about it since, and now he'll have to think how to work it in.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the test mailing list