F-13 Branched report: 20100313 changes

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Sun Mar 14 22:12:47 UTC 2010


On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:04:54 +0000
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> wrote:

> This can be fixed right now by pushing either of these two updates:
> 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libguestfs-1.0.85-2.fc13.3
>   (6 days old)
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libguestfs-1.0.85-2.fc13.4
>   (2 days old)
> 
> But because these updates haven't spent two weeks in updates-testing,
> we'll keep seeing these errors, and installing libguestfs in F-13 will
> keep causing problems for people not using updates-testing.

There is no "two weeks in testing" requirement for Fedora releases
currently. Perhaps you are thinking of the EPEL rule? 

> I think if the current package in stable is definitely broken, then
> this is a case for being able to short circuit the two weeks wait.
> (Even if the update we push is broken, the result won't be any worse).

You can push to stable if you feel it's needed currently. Those
packages are not critical path, and so all it takes is karma and/or the
maintainer pushing them to stable. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20100314/98286fa5/attachment.bin 


More information about the test mailing list