minimal install too minimal
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Thu Mar 18 14:02:52 UTC 2010
Tom Horsley (horsley1953 at gmail.com) said:
> > This way both minimal install and bigger
> > installs that use network manager can coexist.
>
> Actually, people claim they can coexist already, now that
> the NM_MANAGED (or whatever it is named) flag has been added
> to the ifcfg files.
That's never set by default, so you'd have them both managing
the same interfaces.
Now, in rawhide/F13, you have integration code such that
ifup/ifdown will call NetworkManager if it's running to
bring devices up/down, however, this is very new code and
probably still needs some shaking out.
> Which really brings up the question:
> Why the heck is network disabled by default? If they can
> in fact coexist, why not just always enable both?
Starting two services is wasteful.
Bill
More information about the test
mailing list