Branched Last Known Good

[James Laska]

On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 17:19 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 12:00 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > 
> > Good question.  The frequency is determined by the schedule [1].  For
> > Fedora 13, we only had 4 scheduled acceptance test runs.  I think
> > scheduling these events makes more sense against rawhide where install
> > images are not provided on a daily basis.  We may need to revisit how to
> > handle this for the branched images which are attempted daily.
> > Obviously, if this turns into a daily task, we'll want to have computers
> > do the work for us here :) 
> 
> Follow up question.  When would be a good time for me to fix my spelling
> thinko and change it from *-lng to *-lkg ?  (:

Heh :) 

As far as I know, none of the workflow is fully documented yet, so no
time like the present for a rename.

Thanks,
James

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20100322/9172fafb/attachment.bin