Update testing policy: how to use Bodhi

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Mar 26 23:31:38 UTC 2010


On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 15:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> The system could do a count of how many of each type of feedback any
> given update has received, but I don't think there's any way we can
> sensibly do some kind of mathematical operation on those numbers and
> have a 'rating' for the update. Such a system would always give odd /
> undesirable results in some cases, I think (just as the current one
> does). I believe the above system would be sufficiently clear that there
> would be no need for such a number, and we would be able to evaluate
> updates properly based just on the information listed.
> 
> What are everyone's thoughts on this? Thanks! 

Unless we use some sort of value for this feedback, there won't be able
to be a way to autopush the update once criteria is reached.  Relying on
everybody to remember to go back to their update and click the button to
make the update go won't work.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20100326/aea7d57b/attachment.bin 


More information about the test mailing list