ProvenTesters Draft (Was: Join Proven Packagers DRAFT)
Adam Williamson
awilliam at redhat.com
Tue Mar 30 22:52:42 UTC 2010
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 12:42 -0400, Christopher Beland wrote:
> It seems to me that critical path packages would benefit from non-Proven
> Testers giving advisory feedback into the system, even if it isn't
> automatically counted. The more people that do testing, the better, and
> packagers can manually evaluate comments by new testers. It just seems
> better to have those comments which may or may not influence the
> decision, than to ignore potential feedback from people who actually
> care enough to test and report back.
This will be the case, the feedback from proventesters is just afforded
higher value in Bodhi. Non-proventesters can still provide feedback.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
More information about the test
mailing list