2010-05-03 @ ** 15:00 UTC ** - Fedora QA meeting recap

James Laska jlaska at redhat.com
Mon May 3 18:15:08 UTC 2010


As always, minutes and IRC transcript available at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20100503

= Attendees =

People present (lines said):

      * jlaska (92)
      * kparal (59)
      * maxamillion (30)
      * wwoods (29)
      * adamw (27)
      * jskladan (15)
      * skvidal (6)
      * zodbot (4)
      * Southern_Gentlem (1)
      * jeff_hann (1)

Regrets:
      * [[User:liam|liam]]
      * [[User:rhe|rhe]]

= Agenda =
      * Proposed meeting agenda -
        http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-May/090560.html
      * MeetBot summary -
        http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-03/fedora-qa.2010-05-03-14.59.html 

== Previous meeting follow-up ==

      * Moved into meeting topics (see below).

== Fedora 13 RC test status ==

Upcoming test milestones:
      * 2010-04-29 - 'Final' Test Compose]] -- 
      * 2010-04-30 - Final Blocker Meeting (f13blocker) #3
        ([http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-04-30/f-13-blocker-review.2010-04-30-16.00.html recap])
      * 2010-05-05 - Final Blocker Meeting (f13blocker) #4
      * 2010-05-06 - Test 'Final' RC

No upcoming test days

Please direct ideas for improving QA process to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_QA_Retrospective

== Proventesters check-in ==

The team discussed possible next steps, including ...
      * Mass subscribing current ''qa'' group members to
        ''proventesters''
      * Updating bodhi to rely on ''proventesters'' group for critpath
        feedback

In order to move [[QA/JoinProvenTesters:Draft]] out of draft, what else
is needed?
      * need test guidelines for proventesters (something to explain why
        they are needed), including how to prioritize update testing
      * need guidance for mentor responsibilities (manage
        ''proventesters'' requests, keeping documentation up to date)
      * Kparal suggesting that ''proventesters'' may mentor others,
        within some reasonable limits, no need for special FAS group for
        mentors

== Package Acceptance Test Plan check-in ==

      * The test plan is no longer a *draft* !!!
        https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Package_Update_Acceptance_Test_Plan
      * Next steps ...
             1. Create a wiki [[:Category:Test_Cases|Test Case]] out of
                each test case (see
                [https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/62
                ticket#62])
             2. Automate package update acceptance (see
                [https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/milestone/Package%
                20Sanity%20Tests],
                [https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/milestone/Package%
                20update%20tests] and
                [https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/milestone/autoqa%
                20depcheck])

== AutoQA check-in ==

Several recent AutoQA updates, including:

      * jskladan made progress on the autotest-id to the autoqa test
        front
      * jskladan is adding more initscript LSB compliance tests to
        autoqa
      * skvidal provided a patch to allow maintainers a way to subscribe
        to AutoQA test results
      * wwoods finalizing post-bodhi-update watcher, expects a testable
        watcher by end of week

== Open discussion - <Your topic here> ==

=== Please help test MODIFIED and  ON_QA bugs ===

To contribute test feedback, please help test a MODIFIED or ON_QA
blocker bug (see [http://tinyurl.com/3ae37qy list]).

= Action items =

     1. jlaska to migrate approved FAS 'qa' members into 'proventesters'
     2. jlaska to request bodhi change to require 'proventesters'
        feedback for critpath
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20100503/b2042a47/attachment.bin 


More information about the test mailing list