2010-05-03 @ ** 15:00 UTC ** - Fedora QA meeting recap

[Thomas Spura]

Am Mittwoch, den 05.05.2010, 16:02 -0400 schrieb James Laska:
> On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 14:15 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > = Action items =
> > 
> >      1. jlaska to migrate approved FAS 'qa' members into
> > 'proventesters'
> 
> I have migrated all approved FAS 'qa' group members into the
> 'proventesters' group.
> 
> >      2. jlaska to request bodhi change to require 'proventesters'
> >         feedback for critpath 
> 
> I filed a bodhi TRAC request to update to using the proventesters group
> for all QA critpath feedback (see
> https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/424).

There are saw a few times 'proventester' and 'proventesters' somewhere.

e.g.:
- When filing a new ticket it's 'proventester'
- On the wiki page [1] it redirected also to the fas group
'proventester', which does not exist! (I just changed it to
proventesters also)
- The fas group is named 'proventesters'.
- The ticket in bodhi [2] is also about 'proventesters'

I suggest to rename the group to proventester, so it's the same than
provenpackager and to be consistant.

Opinions?

    Thomas

[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/JoinProvenTesters:Draft#How_to_Join
[2] https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/424