New F13Blocker Bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590935
kvolny at redhat.com
Wed May 12 08:13:28 UTC 2010
On Tuesday 11 of May 2010 16:14:32 Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 11:28 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 of May 2010 09:15:31 Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > For instance I have reported another one as bug 582525,
> > > which I deem much more serious, and still unfortunately
> > > closed as notabug.
> > well, I think you shouldn't be that shy :-) and just reopen
> > the report if you disagree with the resolution
> > I guess you have enough info to reopen as RFE yourself
> > NOTABUG really is not an appropriate resolution here
> > if this is not going to be fixed, then either
> > WONTFIX or DEFERRED - I know Adam has tons of other stuff to
> > do
> It's not an X bug.
I've meant Kamil's bug #582525
> At any rate, I'm like 93% sure it worked like this in F12 too.
> If it wasn't important enough to block F12...
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp kavol at jabber.cz
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
:: easily be explained by stupidity."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20100512/871cf2c3/attachment.bin
More information about the test