New F13Blocker Bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590935

[Karel Volný]

On Tuesday 11 of May 2010 16:14:32 Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 11:28 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 of May 2010 09:15:31 Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > For instance I have reported another one as bug 582525,
> > > which I deem much more serious, and still unfortunately
> > > closed as notabug.
> 
> > well, I think you shouldn't be that shy :-) and just reopen
> > the report if you disagree with the resolution
> > 
> > I guess you have enough info to reopen as RFE yourself
> >
> > NOTABUG really is not an appropriate resolution here
> > 
> > if this is not going to be fixed, then either
> > WONTFIX or DEFERRED - I know Adam has tons of other stuff to
> > do
>
> It's not an X bug.

I've meant Kamil's bug #582525

however ...

> At any rate, I'm like 93% sure it worked like this in F12 too.
>  If it wasn't important enough to block F12...

agreed :)

K.

-- 
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp kavol at jabber.cz
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
::  easily be explained by stupidity."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20100512/871cf2c3/attachment.bin