F12 critical path testing
James Laska
jlaska at redhat.com
Mon Oct 11 18:17:53 UTC 2010
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 12:56 -0500, John Watzke wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM, James Laska <jlaska at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 10:58 -0500, John Watzke wrote:
> > Thanks Thomas. This will work great. Now we just need
> to figure
> > out how to drive this initiative.
>
>
> I think you just did! Best way to start, is by discussing and
> following
> up.
>
>
> Okay, let me look over the test case and test plan templates and
> see what can be put together. I do like your suggestion of starting
> with the heavy hitters such as firefox/kernel/glibc. That will get us
> started and we can work our way down to the more obscure test cases.
>
> Sometime this week, I'll put up a wiki page with a general list of
> known critpath packages. This will give us a working set to start on.
> I'm thinking we can use that list to let folks "sign up" to track down
> the maintainer and work through the processing of defining a test case
> for the package and perhaps updating the status of preparing the
> tests. Nothing too fancy... just something to keep some status on.
Awesome, I appreciate your initiative here :) If you find it helpful to
manage status and coordinate efforts with multiple proventesters, feel
free to file tickets in the fedora-qa TRAC instance. Let me know if
you'd like to create any additional TRAC milestones to organize this
effort.
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/
Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20101011/bb55b066/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the test
mailing list