QA:Testcase Anaconda save traceback to remote system

[James Laska]

On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:49 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 04:43 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > In this test case
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
> > 
> > there's this sentence:
> > #  On the Save dialog, choose Remote server from the destination list.
> > 
> > However, after hitting Save button, I have following options:
> > scp, local, ftp, bugzilla.redhat.com, (Cancel)
> > 
> > I suppose the GUI changed from the time this test case was written, and
> > both "scp" and "ftp" options should validate this test case, right?
> > 
> > I'll update the test case if I hear no disagreement.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Kamil
> 
> Very appreciate it. I just used to execute this test without reading the
> steps carefully. Thanks Kamil.

Good catch.  All of the exception reporting (python-meh, setroubleshoot)
now goes through the 'report' tool.  I don't think ABRT uses this
utility.

Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20101025/bcb3ac7d/attachment.bin