no modue named yum

cornel panceac cpanceac at gmail.com
Sat Oct 30 06:18:05 UTC 2010


2010/10/30 Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com>

> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 12:07 +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > yes, that was it:
> >
> > yum-3.2.28-4.fc13
> >
> > however, yum could have figured that putting a fc14 package over a
> > fc13 one is  happening for one and only one reason ....
>
> Trying to make yum 'smart' to deal with this kind of packaging problem
> is a really bad idea and would just lead to other stuff breaking in
> weird fashion, most likely. The correct fix is to not push updates like
> this, which will be sorted by AutoQA in future.
>
> This has been dealt with, now - a yum-3.2.28-5 has been pushed to f13
> and f14 which makes sure that the f14 package is versioned higher than
> f12's and f13's, so f12-f14 and f13-f14 upgrades should be okay now (as
> far as *this* problem is concerned), once the problem with updates not
> actually showing up in the updates repo is solved.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
> http://www.happyassassin.net
>
> this is good news, thank you very much. btw, is there a newer install dvd
than rc1?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20101030/a8022423/attachment.html 


More information about the test mailing list