FTBFS triage request

[Siddhesh Poyarekar]

On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 10:52:48AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 19:17:13 +0530,
>   Siddhesh Poyarekar <spoyarek at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > I had just started working on this, but I noticed that in some cases
> > the builds were not pushed as updates. Should these be closed as
> > CURRENTRELEASE?
> 
> When I was getting more time to work on this I was doing things both ways.
> If the maintainer hadn't touched the ticket and there were successful
> builds since the initial report, then I closed the ticket since it was
> clear the package was no longer FTBFS. (Though there might still be
> issues with pushing the version that builds out.)
> 
> However if the maintainer was working with the bug, then I let things
> take their normal course. Typically that would mean being on QA with
> bodhi set to close the bug once the build made it to stable.

Ok, but what good is a build if it has not been pushed out through
bodhi? Couldn't we have another option, like successful builds being
auto-pushed or something? I know that auto-pushing is probably not a
very good idea but that's the best I can think of right now.

--
Siddhesh