1000 Bug reports

James Laska jlaska at redhat.com
Wed Sep 29 19:55:18 UTC 2010


Greetings,

This is great data, thanks for sharing Orion!  I've cc'd the test@ list
as well since I think this is of value there.  

On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 11:10 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I apologize for this little bit of hubris.  I recently filed my 1000th bug 
> report at bugzilla.redhat.com (unfortunately closed NOTABUG).  I thought I'd 
> take a look at my statistics.
> 
> First bug filed 2002-12-07 (RHL 8.0)
> Avg rate of bugs - 1 / 2.85 days
> Most bugs filed in a day: 7
>        7 2008-03-18
>        7 2009-03-17
> (Hmm, what is it about the ides of March! (probably testing new releases))
> Top months:
>       29 2009-03
>       33 2008-03
> By year:
>        1 2002
>        5 2003
>       18 2004
>      123 2005
>      198 2006
>      145 2007
>      197 2008
>      192 2009 

I'm wondering if this was related to the anaconda storage re-write?
That doesn't explain the similar numbers from previous years, but it
would be interesting+difficult to map these trends to releases/features.

>      121 2010 (a little slow to hit my ~200/year pace)
> 
> Top components:
>       19 autofs  (we automount home and data dirs)
>       21 NetworkManager
>       32 selinux-policy-targeted
>       73 Package Review
>       91 selinux-policy ( I like quiet logwatch reports! )
>      104 kernel
>      112 anaconda (I do a lot of automated installs)

I've said this to you before, but I'll say it again ... thank you for
your contributions to Fedora installation validation.

> 6 palindrome bugs:
> 523325
> 528825
> 587785
> 523325
> 528825
> 587785

Heh, cute statistic.  It's a shame there are no door prizes for the
number of palindrome bugs.  Otherwise, you would win them. :P 

> Open:
>       24 ASSIGNED
>        4 MODIFIED
>       73 NEW
>        4 ON_QA
> 
> Resolved:
> "valid":
>       10 CLOSED CANTFIX
>      134 CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
>        2 CLOSED DEFERRED
>       75 CLOSED ERRATA
>      125 CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
>      265 CLOSED RAWHIDE
>       19 CLOSED UPSTREAM
> 
> "invalid":
>       70 CLOSED DUPLICATE
>        8 CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
>       99 CLOSED NOTABUG
>       70 CLOSED WONTFIX
>       18 CLOSED WORKSFORME
> 
> So 26.5% (so far) of my reports are no so useful.  I shall have to try harder!

I don't think I'd call them 'not useful'.  I subscribe to having more
data, than no data.  Of course, as a maintainer I've never had to
DUPLICATE a large number of bugs.  Your duplicate numbers above, while
yes they add time spent triaging and duplicating related issues, they
also impress upon the prevalence of the problem.

> Here's to the next 1000!

Congrats and cheers! :)

Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20100929/f665553a/attachment.bin 


More information about the test mailing list