Release Criteria for image sizes

Dennis Gilmore dennis at ausil.us
Mon Apr 11 18:54:31 UTC 2011


On Monday, April 11, 2011 01:19:05 PM Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 13:08 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Monday, April 11, 2011 11:11:21 AM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:43:00 -0700,
> > > 
> > >   Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > Proposal: Alpha criteria stating:
> > > > 
> > > > The network installation image, DVD image, and live images for
> > > > supported desktops[1] must meet current size requirements[2]
> > > 
> > > I'm flexible on the exact milestone where we start enforcing this, but
> > > the proposal looks good.
> > 
> > I would say that it be a Beta Criteria.  I think at alpha if they are too
> > big oh well.  but beta should be much close to GA so should be within
> > the size limits. the srpms dvd is 5.3G for Alpha, it was 4.9G in F-14
> > and 4.2G in F-13. and i honestly think that the source dvd should be
> > excempt from the size restrictions.  since you can not use it to install
> > a system.
> 
> it's meant to be - note 'dvd image', singular. I didn't intend to
> include the sources DVD. do we even generate it for alpha/beta?
We do generate it for alpha and beta, 

Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20110411/00c1e535/attachment.bin 


More information about the test mailing list