Release Criteria for image sizes

[James Laska]

On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 13:54 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday, April 11, 2011 01:19:05 PM Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 13:08 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > On Monday, April 11, 2011 11:11:21 AM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:43:00 -0700,
> > > > 
> > > >   Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > Proposal: Alpha criteria stating:
> > > > > 
> > > > > The network installation image, DVD image, and live images for
> > > > > supported desktops[1] must meet current size requirements[2]
> > > > 
> > > > I'm flexible on the exact milestone where we start enforcing this, but
> > > > the proposal looks good.
> > > 
> > > I would say that it be a Beta Criteria.  I think at alpha if they are too
> > > big oh well.  but beta should be much close to GA so should be within
> > > the size limits. the srpms dvd is 5.3G for Alpha, it was 4.9G in F-14
> > > and 4.2G in F-13. and i honestly think that the source dvd should be
> > > excempt from the size restrictions.  since you can not use it to install
> > > a system.
> > 
> > it's meant to be - note 'dvd image', singular. I didn't intend to
> > include the sources DVD. do we even generate it for alpha/beta?
> We do generate it for alpha and beta, 

In the past, source ISO's have been generated, but only after QA signed
off on a milestone/release.  I don't recall seeing them go through any
testing or criteria asserts.  Do we want to change this and provide
source ISO's alongside current ISO drops?  Or would another mechanism
make more sense?

Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20110411/390bdd55/attachment.bin