Fallback mode further hosed?

[Jason D. Clinton]

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 14:10, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:

> Exactly that ought not happen. Instead, Rawhide would typically move ahead
> of the F-15 branch due to packagers dropping even newer stuff into
> Rawhide [1], and then updates to F-15 branched no longer inherit from
> Rawhide. Plus, _that_ bears a higher risk of breaking Rawhide at run-time
> *and* build-time, requiring fixes for run-time issues *and* fixes for
> build-time issues (such as rebuilds and further upgrades for broken deps
> or other incompatibilities).
>
> [1] And a single incompatible component in Rawhide already can cause
> problems when building packages that would be in sync with F-15 branched.
>

This is not the list to have this flame war again. This is the test@ list
for QA for the branched release.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20110422/aa72e62a/attachment.html