Well, I have tried systemd now ...

[Michał Piotrowski]

Hi,

2011/4/26 Michal Jaegermann <michal at harddata.com>:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:25:47AM -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
>> On 04/26/2011 11:18 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> >> systemd comes with extensive documentation and your typical response to
>> >> all changes isn't applicable here.  If you are going to claim lack of
>> >> documentation, can you be more specific?
>> >>
>> >> http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/
>> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd
>> >
>> > That includes links to such "perls of wisdom" as
>> > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
>> > which in effect says: "I broke it and I totally do not care. Anyway,
>> > this is all your fault as you are stupid enough to run a system
>> > laid out not the way I like it."  Why I am not surprised?
>>
>> Did you read it?  It actually says "I did not break it - it's been
>> broken for a while in a number of different ways".
>
> Yes, I read it.  That is a very feeble excuse as what's "been broken
> for a while" works just fine now so that claim is at least stretching
> reality.
>
> Watching for some time on lkml how kernel developers try to avoid
> breaking existing working systems could be educational.

AFAIK systemd adds only a warning about /usr on separate partition -
nothing more.

>
>  Michal
> --
> test mailing list
> test at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
>



-- 
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/