Post-TC1 strategizin'

[James Laska]

On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 22:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 08:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Don't quite see what you mean. We're behind because the TC1 images
> > were delayed by a week, that's pretty much it. The shape they're in
> > when they arrive is a function of the developers, we don't have much
> > control over it =) 
> 
> That is a bit of a cop out really.   We can and should be thinking about
> what we can do to avoid such issues even if QA cannot change the process
> independently.   There must be room for improvement here. 

Always room for improvement, or at least for bouncing around ideas.
Please note the problems you've observed ... and if you have suggestions
for fixing ... don't hold back on those either.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_QA_Retrospective#Could_have_been_better

My intent with the retrospective pages is so we document the problems as
they happen.  Even if we don't have brilliant ideas for resolving the
issue, it's helpful to see how many times the same issue surfaces, and
what has been attempted in the past.

Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20110804/3f27e3d5/attachment.bin