grub instead of grub2 in F16?

[Felix Miata]

On 2011/08/09 13:34 (GMT-0400) James Laska composed:

> On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 11:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:

>>  Then there needs to be an option to install no bootloader. There's no excuse
>>  for making anything so poorly documented the default anything, much less an
>>  only anything.

> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Installation_Guide/s1-x86-bootloader.html

The reason I brought this up is my assumption that Fedora's Grub2 
installation might pattern itself after *buntu's, which destroys OS/2 LVM 
information situated in the sector preceding  the EBR for /dev/XdX5 even when 
all partitioning has taken place prior to system installation, and thus 
nothing should be written regarding such base EBR sector in the MBR table. 
IOW, the *buntu process advances the first sector of the extended partition 
by one from the standard location.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dfsee-support/message/13672
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dfsee-support/message/13796
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dfsee-support/message/13855
-- 
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

  Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/