Testing and Karma for Alpha Required Packages

Tim Flink tflink at redhat.com
Tue Aug 16 21:38:35 UTC 2011

Ahead of an RC5 release, I created an unofficial netinstall iso with
the new libreport and anaconda builds.
 * http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/boot-x86_64.iso
 * http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/boot-x86_64.iso.sha256

If anyone has the time and inclination to test that boot.iso and,
assuming there is no breakage, add karma to the following updates:

 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lorax-16.4.1-1.fc16
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anaconda-16.14.6-1.fc16
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libreport-2.0.5-6.fc16
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dracut-011-41.git20110810

Doing any sort of installation should be enough for testing lorax and
anaconda. If that system boots without issue after install, that should
be enough for dracut karma.

For libreport, the following testcase is useful:

We haven't updated that test case for the new libreport in F16 yet but
you should be added as a CC to any non-closed duplicate reports and
nothing happens if the bug is closed.

Right now, using a non-random traceback in graphical mode should add a
CC to the following bug:
 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731047

Using a non-random traceback in text mode should find the following bug
and do nothing since it has been closed:
 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731145

Thanks for testing,

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20110816/60058d2d/attachment.bin 

More information about the test mailing list