Release criteria: kickstart

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:54 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:

> I'm still on the opinion that we should not be adding an ks testing to 
> the alpha criteria.
> 
> Cant we just create a set of most commonly ks use cases in ks files for 
> releng and they can use pungi to test it with and post the result 
> somewhere online with pass/fail more of an autoqa task and say all those 
> must pass before beta?
> 
> Where does the need for those ks testing suddenly come from and why do 
> we need to have those ks test involved in alpha?

sorry, I skipped over Smooge's mention of Alpha. I was aiming for Beta,
not Alpha. I think Smooge's minimal 'does a stock install ks file work'
would be fine as a Beta test.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net