Release criteria: kickstart
awilliam at redhat.com
Fri Aug 26 00:00:23 UTC 2011
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:54 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> I'm still on the opinion that we should not be adding an ks testing to
> the alpha criteria.
> Cant we just create a set of most commonly ks use cases in ks files for
> releng and they can use pungi to test it with and post the result
> somewhere online with pass/fail more of an autoqa task and say all those
> must pass before beta?
> Where does the need for those ks testing suddenly come from and why do
> we need to have those ks test involved in alpha?
sorry, I skipped over Smooge's mention of Alpha. I was aiming for Beta,
not Alpha. I think Smooge's minimal 'does a stock install ks file work'
would be fine as a Beta test.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
More information about the test